I P and A logoCommon Data SetPublicationsODIN Data ProvidersFederal ReportingTargetsPublicationsFact BookData and ReportingWhere to FindAbout IP&ABack to Cal Poly Home PageBack to IP and A Home PageIP and A Logo, Back to IP and A Home PagePoly ViewInfo BriefPoly Trends

You are here: Cal Poly Home Page > IP&A Home Page > Targets > 2000-01 Enrollment Targets


Targets

Official Enrollment Targets
2005-2006 Enrollment Targets (February 28, 2005)
2004-2005 Enrollment Targets (February 21, 2004)
2003-2004 Enrollment Targets (March 6, 2003)
2002-2003 Enrollment Targets (March 14, 2002)
2001-2002 Enrollment Targets (March 8, 2001)
2000-2001 Enrollment Targets (March 6, 2000)
1999-2000 Enrollment Targets (January 20, 1999)

 

Official Enrollment Targets for 2000-2001

March 6, 2000

The following tables show Cal Poly's enrollment targets for the 2000-01 year. Institutional Planning and Analysis assembles these targets from three main sources:

  • The Chancellor's Office assigns a College Year Full-time Equivalent Student (CY FTES) level for budget purposes. Cal Poly will receive enrollment growth funds from the State for the increase in budgeted CY FTES for 2000-01 as compared with the budgeted CY FTES for 1999-2000.
  • The Council of Academic Deans sets new headcount targets for each college and UCTE. Analysis focuses on maintaining a balance of students among the colleges, especially at the undergraduate level. In order to encourage post-baccalaureate education, such programs may admit additional qualified students if they have sufficient instructional capacity.
  • The Office of Admissions reviews the size and quality of applicant pools for each undergraduate discipline or program with the Associate Deans. The colleges then allocate new undergraduate enrollment among their departments, including targets for new freshmen as compared with transfer students.
Table 1. Comparison of Recent Past Enrollments with Projections for 1999-2000 and Targets for 2000-01

Table 1 compares data and projections for the past two college years with targets for 2000-01. It shows that Cal Poly's enrollment has been just under the budgeted CY FTES target for the past two years. In contrast, the campus exceeded its target in 1995-96, 1996-97 and 1997-98 by a range of 2-5 percent. In an effort to manage enrollments to coincide with operating budgets, the campus reduced admissions, but over-corrected and fell below target this past year.

For 2000-01 Cal Poly is setting a CY FTES target slightly above the level budgeted by the Chancellor's Office to make up the past deficit. This target has two major components:

  • Increase in Summer enrollment. The CSU has mandated that campuses increase their year-round operations to accommodate enrollment growth associated with the increase in demand for higher education known as Tidal Wave II. Summer enrollment grew steadily from 1994 through 1998, but fell off during Summer 1999. For 2000 the campus needs to recover that loss and grow by 5 percent.
  • Increase in Fall admissions. The campus has set a Fall admissions target of about 300 more students than for Fall 1999. In addition, colleges may admit additional upper division transfer students for Summer and Winter quarters to balance enrollment across terms.

Table 1. Comparison of Recent Past Enrollments with Projections for 1999-2000 and Targets for 2000-01

Note: Large tables print best if paper orientation is set to "Landscape."

  1998-99 Actual Enrollments   1999-2000 Actual/Projected Enrollments   2000-01 Targets/Projected Enrollments
 
FINAL CY NUMBERS
after Spring Census
  Actual and projected enrollments
after Spring Census, May 4, 2000
  OFFICIAL TARGETS 
Quarter   HC (Actual) FTES (Actual) Load (Actual)   HC
(Actual/ Projected)
FTES
(Actual/ Projected)
Load
(Actual/ Projected)
  HC
(Actual/ Projected)
FTES
(Actual/ Projected)
Load
(Actual/ Projected)
 
Summer
Total
  4,088  2,502  9.18   3,926  2,414  9.22   4,148  2,535  9.17
  Undergrad 3,810    3,594    3,828   
Post-bacc 278  332  321 
 
Fall 
Total
  16,296  15,121 13.92   16,470  15,301  13.94   17,028  15,799  13.92
 Total Undergrad 15,348    15,503    16,029   
 [New Undergrad*] 3,069  3,656  3,926 
 Total Post-bacc 948  967  999 
 [New Post-bacc] 327  316  349 
   
Winter
Total
  15,777 14,767  14.04   15,992  14,923  14.00   16,509  15,441  14.03
 Undergrad 14,807    14,989    15,482   
 Post-bacc 970  1,003  1,027 
   
Spring
Total
  15,135  13,905 13.78   15,286  14,057  13.79   15,811  14,508  13.76
 Undergrad 14,208    14,309    14,831   
 Post-bacc 927  977  980 
    
Annualized Summer FTES     834        805        845   
AY FTES 14,598  14,760 15,249 
CYFTES - Actual/Projected 15,432 15,565  16,094 
CYFTES - Budgeted 15,569  Adjusted 15,879  16,010 
Actual/Projected: Budgeted -0.88%   -1.98% 0.53%

Notes: Budgeted CYFTES for 1998-99 was adjusted by the Chancellor's Office in July 1998 to cover additional teacher preparation instruction. Quarter-to-quarter ratios and loads for projections are based on weighted 3-year averages for 1996-97, 1997-98, and 1998-99. *New undergrads include new 2nd-baccalaureate students.

Definitions:

  • HC (Headcount): Total number of individual students enrolled for a particular quarter.
  • FTES (Full-time equivalent students): Equal to the total student credit units taken by all students, divided by 15.
  • Summer (annualized): One-third of the enrollment for Summer Quarter.
  • AYFTES (Academic Year FTES): Average FTES for Fall, Winter, and Spring quarters.
  • CYFTES (College Year FTES): Average FTES for Fall, Winter, and Spring quarters, plus Summer quarter (annualized).
  • CYFTES - Budgeted: Enrollment level established by the CSU for operating budget support.
  • Target: Established by the University as a goal for CY, AY and each quarter.
  • Actual: Enrollment on Census Date (28th day) of quarter.
  • Projected: Campus estimate of likely enrollment based on previous quarters. Projections are adjusted after Census Date for each subsequent quarter. (See the most recent projection.)
  • Assumptions: Unless noted otherwise, assumptions for developing targets are based on the weighted average of the prior three similar quarters
Table 2. Target Enrollments for 2000-01 - Official Targets: Enrollment by Student Load for Fee Revenue Projection

This table simply converts the data from Table 1 into the distribution of undergraduate and post-baccalaureate students enrolled full-time (greater than 6 units) vs. part-time (less than or equal to 6 units) for fee purposes.

Table 2. Target Enrollments for 2000-01 - Official Targets: Enrollment by Student Load for Fee Revenue Projection

  For Fee Revenue Projections (from Targets)   For Fee Revenue Projections (Actual/Projected)
Quarter
  HC Target
>6 units
<=6 units Assumptions
(%>6 units)
  HC
Actual and Projected
Calculations
(%>6 units)
>6 units
<=6 units
 
Summer      
To be completed as enrollment occurs. 
  Undergrad   2,691    2,691  70.301%       
Post-bacc 129  191  40.311%       
 
Fall    f   To be completed as enrollment occurs. 
 Undergrad   15,714     315  98.034%         
 Post-bacc 779  220  77.953%       
 
Winter   f  
To be completed as enrollment occurs. 
 Undergrad   15,160    322  97.920%         
 Post-bacc 804  223  78.310%       
   
Spring  
f
 
To be completed as enrollment occurs. 
 Undergrad   14,421   410  97.237%       
 Post-bacc 769 211  78.479%     

Note: Full-time for fee purposes equals enrollment in more than six units per quarter.
 
 

Table 3. College Headcount Targets for Fall 2000 - Official Targets

The final table shows detailed college targets by student status. For each college and UCTE, the first columns indicate the estimated number of current undergraduate and post-baccalaureate students who will continue to enroll next Fall (or return in the same program from a leave). Then, for undergraduates, the table displays the different means by which students enter: Early Decision (freshmen only), Multi-Criteria Admissions (MCA - as either freshmen or transfer students), non-MCA (e.g., high achievers not admitted through MCA, athletes, hardship), and College specials (deans' discretion).

Two points are worthy of note:

  • Over 90 percent of the new undergraduates are admitted through the competitive Early Decision and MCA processes. (Readers should remember that all undergraduate students must meet Cal Poly eligibility criteria, even if not admitted through the MCA.)
  • Cal Poly expects that over 80 percent of the new undergraduates in Fall 2000 will enter as freshmen. This percentage has increased over the past decade for several reasons. The size and quality of the freshman applicant pool has increased more rapidly than the applicant pool for transfer students. In addition, the CSU requires that regular upper division transfer students to have completed four general education courses: in mathematics, English, speech, and critical thinking. This requirement differs from the University of California, and limits the transfer applicant pool for some colleges in particular (e.g., College of Engineering).

Table 3. College Headcount Targets for Fall 2000 - Official Targets

Undergraduate Headcount
College *Continuing *Returning **Early Decision **MCA FTF **MCA Transfers **MCA Total ***MCA % Transfer **Non-MCA **Coll Spec UG Total
 
CAGR 2,564 16 107 571 203 881
23.0%
20 3 3,484
CAED 1,095 9 48 259 83 390 21.3% 28 0 1,522
CBUS 1,970 19 69 212 88 369 23.8% 45 10 2,413
CENG 2,860 11 134 813 58 1,005 5.8% 80 0 3,956
CLA 2,202 23 59 312 179 550 32.5% 80 3 2,858
CSM 1,299 14 33 262 50 345 14.5% 40 2 1,700
Other 21 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 75 0 96
Total 12,011 92 450 2,429 661 3,540 18.7% 368 18 16,029
 
Post-baccalaureate Headcount
  *Continuing & Returning *New PB Total
 
CAGR 65 25 90
CAED 35 25 60
CBUS 63 47 110
CENG 90 40 130
CLA 70 25 95
CSM 58 38 96
UCTE 245 143 388
Other 24 6 30
Total 650 349 999
 
The total estimated enrollment for Fall 2000 = 17,028
 
Sources: *Kennedy spreadsheet, csize 2000.xls, 1/3/00. **Admissions Enrollment Target Worksheets (Version #4), 2/15/00. 


Overview / Timeline
Annual enrollment and budget planning timelines.

Official Enrollment Targets
2005-2006 Enrollment Targets (February 28, 2005)
2004-2005 Enrollment Targets (February 21, 2004)
2003-2004 Enrollment Targets (March 6, 2003)
2002-2003 Enrollment Targets (March 14, 2002)
2001-2002 Enrollment Targets (March 8, 2001)
2000-2001 Enrollment Targets (March 6, 2000)
1999-2000 Enrollment Targets (January 20, 1999)

Census Update (updated after each Census)
2004-05 Census Update

Targets vs. Actuals
Fall 2003 Targets vs. Actuals (October 30, 2003)

College Year Summary (updated after Spring Census)
Final Enrollment Data for 2003-04

 

 

IP&A Home Page | Data and Reporting | Publications and Studies | Targets | About IP&A

Last Updated: October 30, 2001
Email us: inststdy@polymail.calpoly.edu

 

The web pages for Institutional Planning and Analysis are "Bobby Approved"

Bobby Approved (v 3.2)