EXAMPLE OF RESPONSES
REVIEWER #1:
COMMENT #1: "The case itself reads rather like a Masters project. There is little in it¡K¡K."
RESPONSE: This case is not a Master thesis, it is a consulting project. We have never seen a planning framework like ours in the literature. We believe that with your constructive comments and our revisions, it has significant contribution to the existing literature.
ACTION: None.
COMMENT #2: "I have a question about your percentages for the different sizes of computers. Wouldn't you expect a firm using a mainframe to also have (perhaps) some minis and (certainly) some PCs. Your percentages do not reflect such a situation. The hardware statistics would be more meaningful if they pertained to the primary computer that each firm uses."
RESPONSE: We apologize for the confusion. The percentages refer to the proportion of usage of different sizes of hardware in an average company.
ACTION: We have changed the following text in the paper.
FROM:
"The types of computer used for MKISs included mainframe computers (44%), personal computers (25.1%), minicomputers (22.4%), and multi-user microcomputers (8.5%)."
TO:
"On average, 44% of the hardware used in a company's MKIS are mainframe computers, 25.1% are personal computers, 22.4% are minicomputers, and 8.5% are multi-user microcomputers."