Adopted: December 1, 1998

ACADEMIC SENATE
Of
CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY
San Luis Obispo, CA

AS-512-98/PRAIC
RESOLUTION ON 1997/98 PROGRAM REVIEW AND IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE
REPORT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS



WHEREAS,     The following departments/programs were reviewed during the 1997/98 academic year:

Ethnic Studies Program
Chemistry and Biochemistry
Physics
Psychology and Human Development
Philosophy
Graphic Communication
General Engineering Program
Computer Engineering Program
Business Administration Program (BSBA)
College of Business (MBA)
Construction Management Department
Food Science and Nutrition
Soil Sciences Program; and WHEREAS,     The Academic Senate acknowledges receipt of the Program Review and Improvement Committee's
                           "Report on programs reviewed during 1997/98"; therefore, be it

RESOLVED:     That the Academic Senate receive the Program Review and Improvement Committee's "Report on
                          programs reviewed during 1997/98"; and, be it further

RESOLVED:     That the Program Review and Improvement Committee's "Report on programs reviewed during
                           1997/98" be submitted to the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.

 
  Proposed by: The Academic Senate Program
Review and Improvement Committee
Date: October 27, 1998   State of California

M e m o r a n d u m
 
 

To:     Myron Hood                                                         Date: January 15, 1999
          Chair, Academic Senate
 
 

From: Warren J. Baker                                                    Copies: P. Zingg, D. Conn
            President
 

Subject: Response to Academic Senate Resolution AS-512-98/PRAIC--Resolution on 1997/98 Program Review and Improvement Committee Report of Findings and Recommendations

I am pleased to approve this Resolution and to acknowledge the findings of the Program Review and Improvement Committee. The Committee's findings will be summarized and forwarded to the CSU Chancellor's office. In addition, I understand it is the Provost's intention to continue to meet with the faculty of the programs which have been reviewed during the Winter and Spring Quarters to emphasize the value of internal reviews and to discuss the recommendations within the reviews.

Please express my appreciation to both the Academic Senate and the members of the Senate's Program Review and Improvement Committee for their efforts.