Collegiality
and Collective Bargaining
On September
13, 1978, Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr., signed into law AB 1091, The California
Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act (HEERA). (Education Code
Section 3560, et seq.) This legislation provides faculty members of the
CSU an opportunity to determine whether they wish to be represented by
an exclusive agent in negotiations on " . . . wages, hours of employment,
and other terms and conditions of employment." [Section 3561(r)] This section
of the Government Code also specifies the intent of the Legislature to
preserve, under collective bargaining, traditional shared governance mechanisms,
including consultation, and the principle of peer review in faculty personnel
decisions. These intentions are expressed as follows:
The Legislature recognizes that joint decision-making and consultation between administration and faculty or academic employees is the long-accepted manner of governing institutions of higher learning and is essential to the performance of the educational missions of such institutions, and declares that it is the purpose of this act to both preserve and encourage that process. Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to restrict, limit or prohibit the full exercise of the functions of the faculty in any shared governance mechanisms or practices including the Academic Senate of the University of California and the divisions thereof, the Academic Senates of The California State University and Colleges, and other faculty councils, with respect to policies on academic and professional matters affecting The California State University and Colleges, the University of California, or Hastings College of the Law. The principle of peer review of appointment, promotion, and retention, and tenure for academic employees shall be preserved. [Section 3561(b)]
This
document has been prepared to describe the respective responsibilities
of the Academic Senate of the CSU and of the local Senates or Councils
in this collective bargaining context. The relationships, functions, and
responsibilities proposed in this document reflect consideration of HEERA,
the Constitution of the Academic Senate of the California State University,
and the tradition and practice in the CSU.
The
Traditional Role of the Academic Senate in the CSU
The Trustees
of The California State Colleges approved the Constitution of the Academic
Senate on March 8, 1963. Prior to this a majority of the voting faculty
at each of a majority of the college campuses had approved the document.
Encouragement for the establishment of the systemwide Academic Senate,
as well as for the creation of an Academic Senate on each campus, came
from the Chancellor, members of the Board of Trustees and the California
Legislature. The 1961 Legislature adopted Senate Resolution No. 98 and
Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 78 requesting the Trustees to establish
an Academic Senate at each college " . . . wherein the faculty members
shall be freely elected by their colleagues for the purpose of representing
them in the formulation of policy on academic and professional matters."
Senate Resolution No. 20, which resolved that the Trustees consider establishing
an Academic Senate for the CSC system, was under discussion in the Senate
Rules Committee when the Senate was created in 1963.
An examination
of the initial Constitution of the Academic Senate CSC, as approved by
the Board of Trustees, reveals the official purposes of the Senate:
It shall be the purpose of the Academic Senate of The California State Colleges to serve as the official voice of the faculties of The California State Colleges in matters of systemwide concern; to consider matters concerning systemwide policies and to make recommendations thereon; to endeavor to strengthen the Senates and Councils of the several colleges; and to assume such responsibilities and perform such functions as may be delegated to it by the Chancellor or the Trustees of The California State Colleges.
Senate
participation in academic, professional, and administrative matters during
the 18 years of its existence evidences a tradition of shared governance
in the CSU and suggests appropriate responsibilities for the Senate under
HEERA. The collective bargaining act makes explicit provision for the preservation
of this tradition and mandates continuing senate involvement in academic
and professional matters.
Academic
Senate Participation in Systemwide Governance
The Academic
Senate shall continue to serve as the official voice of the faculties in
systemwide academic and professional matters as specified in the Constitution
of the Academic Senate CSU, Article 1, Section la.
The Academic Senate shall be the formal policy-recommending body on such matters and shall also be the primary consultative body on the academic implications of systemwide fiscal decisions. Normally, recommendations of the Academic Senate shall be addressed to or through the Chancellor.
In respect to systemwide governance, the Academic Senate endorses the following principles:
A.
Criteria and standards to be used for the appointment, promotion, evaluation,
and tenure of
academic employees shall be the joint responsibility of the Academic Senate
and the Board
of Trustees of The California State University and Colleges. [HEERA, Section
3562(r)]
Criteria and standards determined jointly by the Academic Senate and the
Board of Trustees
shall be considered minimal; campus senates/councils may recommend additional
criteria and
standards.
B.
The Academic Senate shall be consulted on the creation of systemwide and
intersegmental
committees, conferences, or task forces designed to deal with educational,
professional, or
academically related fiscal matters, including the charge and composition
of such bodies. The
Academic Senate shall be responsible for the selection of faculty representatives
to serve on
or participate in such bodies.
C.
The Academic Senate shall be the formal policy-recommending body on general,
systemwide
policy decisions related to the following matters:
1) minimum admission requirements for students;
2) minimum conditions for the award of certificates and degrees to students;
3) curricula and research programs;
4) minimum criteria and standards to be used for programs designed to enhance
and maintain
professional competence, including the awarding of academic leaves; and
5) systemwide aspects of academic planning.
D. The Academic Senate shall be consulted on the following:
1) systemwide aspects of program review;
2) systemwide aspects of the basic direction of academic support programs;
3) systemwide policies governing the appointment and review of presidents
and academic
administrators; and
4) policies governing the appointment and review of systemwide executive
officers and
academic administrators.
The Academic Senate shall not participate in the process of collective bargaining. Normally, matters affecting wages, hours of employment, and other terms and conditions of employment shall not be considered by the Academic Senate. The Academic Senate shall endeavor to ensure that educational and professional matters do not become subjects of bargaining.
Campus
Senate/Council Participation in Campus Governance
The Academic
Senate shall have no authority over those matters delegated to the individual
campuses by the Chancellor or by the Board of Trustees of the CSU. Furthermore,
nothing in this document shall be construed to impair the right of academic
senates/councils of the several campuses to communicate through appropriate
channels with the Chancellor and the Board of Trustees, nor to diminish
the authority of the campuses and their senates/councils in campus matters
of academic or professional criteria and standards.
Because joint decision-making and consultation between administrators and faculty is essential to the performance of the educational missions of the California State University, the academic senates/councils of the campuses shall be the primary consultative bodies regarding educational and professional matters delegated to the individual campuses by the Chancellor or by the Board of Trustees and shall be consulted on fiscal matters which affect the instructional program.
In respect to campus governance, the Academic Senate endorses the following principles:
A. Responsibility shall be vested in the faculty or its elected senate/council representatives for:
1) approval of degree candidates; and
2) development of policies governing the awarding of grades.
B.
Through the campus academic senates /councils responsibility shall be vested
in the faculty or
its elected senate/council representatives for developing policies and
making recommendations
to the campus presidents on the following matters:
1) criteria and standards for the appointment, retention, awarding of tenure,
promotion and
evaluation of academic employees, including preservation of the principle
of peer
evaluation and provision for the direct involvement of appropriate faculty
in these decisions;
2) determination of membership in the General Faculty;
3) curricular policies, such as admission and degree requirements, approval
of new courses
and programs, discontinuance of academic programs, and academic standards;
4) faculty appointments to institutional task forces, advisory committees,
and auxiliary
organizations; and
5) academic standards and academic policies governing athletics.
C.
The academic senate/councils shall be the primary source of policy recommendations
to the
campus president on decisions related to the following matters:
1) establishment of campuswide committees on academic or professional matters;
2) the academic role of the library;
3) academic awards, prizes, and scholarships;
4) the academic conduct of students and means for handling infractions;
and
5) development of institutional missions and goals.
D. The academic senates/councils shall be consulted by the campus presidents concerning:
1) the academic calendar and policies governing the scheduling of classes;
and
2) policies governing the appointment and review of academic administrators.
E.
This outline of functions and responsibilities is intended to provide the
essentials for a satisfactory
system of shared governance but should not necessarily be viewed as a comprehensive
enumeration of such functions and responsibilities.
(This document
was approved by the Academic Senate CSU in May 1981.)